Farmer Producer Organisations and Rural Market Power: A Review of Economic and Extension Perspectives
Mayuri Sing Sardar *
OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
P. V. Munde
DPCOA, Dahegaon, VNMKV, Parbhani, India.
Shivabasappa Kandkur
Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture, Karekere, Hassan, India.
Nazreenbanu Tahasildar
Agricultural Sciences Foundation, Hulkoti, India.
S. Anitha
KVK, Chandurayanahalli, Magadi, Ramanagara, India.
Moinuddin
Department of Agronomy, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Ajit Kumar Singh
Department of Agricultural Economics, S. M. M. Town P.G. College, Jannayak Chandrashekhar University, Ballia, U.P., India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) are increasingly recognised as institutional mechanisms for addressing the market-power asymmetries, transaction costs and information barriers faced by smallholder farmers. This review synthesises economic and extension perspectives on FPOs by drawing on peer-reviewed literature published between 2004 and 2024, supported by foundational theoretical contributions and authoritative institutional reports. It examines how collective organisation influences market access, price realisation, input procurement, value addition, technology adoption and household welfare, while also considering the role of agricultural extension in strengthening organisational performance and farmer-level learning processes. The review shows that FPOs can improve farmers' bargaining capacity, reduce individual transaction costs, support access to differentiated markets and facilitate the delivery of advisory services, particularly where they operate through transparent governance systems and viable market linkages. Evidence from South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America indicates that outcomes remain highly context dependent. Benefits are stronger when FPOs combine market functions with extension support, member capacity building, credible leadership and access to infrastructure, finance and information. However, the literature also identifies persistent concerns related to elite capture, weak financial sustainability, gendered participation barriers and the exclusion of poorer or less commercially connected farmers. The review concludes that FPOs should not be treated as uniformly effective instruments of rural development; rather, their contribution depends on the interaction between internal governance, external institutional support and the inclusiveness of membership design. Further longitudinal and comparative research is needed to clarify the conditions under which FPOs generate durable, equitable and welfare-enhancing outcomes for smallholder members overall.
Keywords: Farmer producer organisations, agricultural cooperatives, collective action, rural market power, agricultural extension, smallholder farmers, market access, value chains, governance, social inclusion, technology adoption, rural development.